Mao engagingly evokes the dynamism of Chinese middle-class life and aspirations through detailed analyses of popular novels and mass-circulation magazines in Shanghai during the early years of the Republic of China. Just as early-20th-century US magazines (Saturday Evening Post, Ladies’ Home Journal) entertainingly instilled middle-class values in their readerships, Shanghai periodicals—e.g., Saturday (Lĭbàiliù) and Ladies’ Journal (Fùnǚ zázhì)—helped early-Republican-era middle-class readers navigate the rapidly changing Chinese sociocultural landscape…. Recommended. Lower-division undergraduates through faculty; general readers.
— Choice Reviews
In this refreshing and insightful book, Peijie Mao paints vibrant scenes of urban culture around the influential magazine Saturday in early twentieth century Shanghai. Departing from highbrow, canonical discourses, the book delves into mass-consumed writings and sheds light on how editors, writers, and publishers met eager readers and consumers. In creating a thriving market, consumer fantasies, lifestyles, and aesthetics, Shanghai’s popular culture fostered new imaginaries of women, domestic life as well as visions of modernity.
— Ban Wang, Stanford University
An indispensable work on the popular literature and urban culture in early Republican Shanghai. It sophisticatedly shows the Butterfly writers’ patriotic ethos and their agenda of promoting the “ideal family,” a project mixed tradition and modernity; their love stories tell us more how common city dwellers dream of and struggle for a “middle society” and how literary imaginaries play a crucial role in popular cultural production and consumption.
— Chen Jianhua, Fudan University
Peijie Mao offers a fresh perspective on popular fiction magazines—Saturday in particular—in a critical Republican decade from 1914 to 1925. Her attentiveness to the interplay between social imaginaries and social formations is extremely productive, particularly in her examination of the role of fictional “middle class heroes” in forging an ethos for the new middle society, and in her probing of the depth and range of sentiments invested in new practices of reading by both the producers and the consumers of the journals.
— Joan Judge, York University